RE: Port Scanning Issues

["Strykar" <str () hackerzlair org>]

That is odd.
Scan with nmap and compare the results.


-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On
Behalf Of crumdub12 () gmail com
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 3:30 AM
To: pen-test () securityfocus com
Subject: Port Scanning Issues

A Chairde,

   Havin, some issues with scanning stacks on my system.

1. Using Superscan4 ,  I scan stack UDP-TCP 1-65534 , Sometimes I 
get no ports open , another time I get 49159 UDP Ports open, only get port
report, no attempt made to open any ports ... , when get open ports , I
always get 49159 UDP Ports ...... , use the scanner at 250msecs , takes
around 16 hours to finish.

2. Using Languard, Nessus and Retina , get different scans from each tool,
any ideas why, how do I find out real ports open.. differences can be 10,000
ports


------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat?
Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic
See HOW Now with our 20/20 program!

http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020
------------------------------------------------------------------------


------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by: Cenzic

Need to secure your web apps NOW?
Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast.
Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today!

http://www.cenzic.com/downloads
------------------------------------------------------------------------