Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: RE: Changing Source Port during Penetration Testing?
From: "Jamie Riden" <jamesr () europe com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 11:45:20 +1300
On 7 Nov 2006 13:43:14 -0000, emptybeerkann () gmail com <emptybeerkann () gmail com> wrote:
You are right. Most firewalls are stateful now, but what if the organization isn't using a firewall? What if they are using a router or some other device instead? This technique once again becomes a viable option.
I would guess the more usual scenario is to have a stateful firewall on the perimeter, plus maybe some ACLs applied on internal routers. Still, you're right - trying a few different source ports may help, and it doesn't hurt to try. cheers, Jamie -- Jamie Riden, CISSP / jamesr () europe com / jamie.riden () gmail com NZ Honeynet project - http://www.nz-honeynet.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps? Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast. Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE. http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=701600000008bOW ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Changing Source Port during Penetration Testing? 09sparky (Nov 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Changing Source Port during Penetration Testing? Michael Scheidell (Nov 05)
- Re: RE: Changing Source Port during Penetration Testing? emptybeerkann (Nov 07)
- Re: RE: Changing Source Port during Penetration Testing? Gadi Evron (Nov 07)
- Re: RE: Changing Source Port during Penetration Testing? Jamie Riden (Nov 07)
- Re: Changing Source Port during Penetration Testing? warl0ck (Nov 09)