Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: Re: NMap Scanning Issues
From: 09Sparky () gmail com
Date: 1 May 2006 14:08:24 -0000
Thanks for the suggestion. I did try to slow the scan down with a -T4, but my results still come back the same (well inaccurate). It is interesting that when I run individual small scans against a single IP my results are accurate, but when I run a large port scan, they are inaccurate. Immediately after that, I run the small port scan again and they are also inaccurate. If I wait about 15-30 minutes and try the small port scan again, the results are again accurate. So at this point I am going to try and remove my local firewall and test. Any other suggestions? Thanks, 09Sparky ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Concerned about Web Application Security? Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the Analyst's Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to rise, you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software (Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your results from other product. Contact us at request () cenzic com for details. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Re: Re: NMap Scanning Issues 09Sparky (May 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Re: NMap Scanning Issues Mackley, Peter (May 02)