Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: RE: pentest physical security
From: kratzer.jason () gmail com
Date: 31 Jul 2006 20:34:31 -0000
Also, check out NIST's guidelines for physical security checks. Some requirements are based on outside lights, fence heights, etc.. Some CISSP study guides I have seen in the past make a good evaluation of physical security and offer good starting points. Also, the OSSTMM (page 75) offers a pretty good breakdown of what to look for in physical security implementations. The manual can be found here: http://www.isecom.info/mirror/osstmm.en.2.1.1.pdf ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Concerned about Web Application Security? Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the Analyst's Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to rise, you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software (Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your results from other product. Contact us at request () cenzic com for details. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- pentest physical security scott (Jul 31)
- Re: pentest physical security UnODir (Jul 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: pentest physical security Levenglick, Jeff (Jul 31)
- RE: [lists] RE: pentest physical security Curt Purdy (Jul 31)
- Re: RE: pentest physical security kratzer . jason (Jul 31)
- Re: pentest physical security shiri_yacov (Jul 31)