Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: Re: Re: CISSP
From: mr.nasty () ix netcom com
Date: 5 Dec 2006 14:23:23 -0000
Don't take it. It's not worth YOUR time. If you have to question yourself and the merits publicly then it can't be worth your time. For some of us it was. So I guess you can conclude that all CISSP's are as good as an 11 year old. That's why ISC2 required an education so at least there would be some deductive reasoning process. Most OJT'ers do things the way they picked them up, this is all a process. So if you learned the wrong way then 15 years from now when an auditor asks why you don't change to a more efficient method you answer, "that's the way I've always done it". Not that an education will prevent complacency. That's just my personal observation. Are there educated idiots? Again I ask take a look in the Oval Office. Are there smart and intelligent uneducated people? You make the choice for yourself. To ponder this publicly makes it appear your trying to justify either not taking the exam or giving up because you didn't pass the first time. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps? Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast. Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE. http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=701600000008bOW ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- RE: CISSP, (continued)
- Re: Re: CISSP R. DuFresne (Dec 19)
- RE: Re: CISSP Mueller, Daniel (NMCI CIRT) (Dec 20)
- RE: CISSP Craig Wright (Dec 04)
- Re: RE: CISSP mr . nasty (Dec 04)
- RE: RE: CISSP Bates, Chris (Dec 05)
- Re: RE: CISSP Tim Shea (Dec 05)
- Re: Re: Re: CISSP mr . nasty (Dec 05)
- Re: CISSP Michael Krzeszkowski (Dec 05)
- Re: CISSP Michael Mooney (Dec 10)
- Re: Re: CISSP shyaam (Dec 20)
- Re: Re: CISSP R. DuFresne (Dec 27)