Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: Packet Payload
From: Joey Peloquin <joeyp () cotse net>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:43:14 -0500
Clemens, Dan wrote: [snip]
BTW, you won't fall into any legal mumbo shumbo performing analysis on traffic. -Daniel Clemens
True, unless your company hasn't had everyone sign the necessary waivers, the loss of expectation of privacy document, etc., and you *do* choose to act upon what you find. We're practically going to court already with *our* legal department over this because we're about to turn up a new IPP device (with which we found all kinds of stuff going on during the eval). -jp ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps? Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast. Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE. http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Re: Packet Payload, (continued)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Packet Payload Mike Klingler (Aug 30)
- RE: Packet Payload Robert D. Holtz - Lists (Aug 30)
- Re: Packet Payload griffkc (Aug 31)
- Re: Packet Payload xelerated (Aug 30)
- RE: Packet Payload Clemens, Dan (Aug 29)
- Re: Packet Payload xelerated (Aug 29)
- Re: Packet Payload Joey Peloquin (Aug 30)