Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: Wireless Pent-Test
From: n0g0013 <ttz () cobbled net>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 08:04:43 +0100
a lot is said about the _actual_ security of WEP and nothing is said about the legal security of it. IMHO, the primary thing that can be said in the defense of WEP is that it forces somebody to commit a crime in accessing your data or network. using WEP is not useless but does not protect your data. -- t t z --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tired of constantly searching the web for the latest exploits? Tired of using 300 different tools to do one job? Get CORE IMPACT and get some rest. www.coresecurity.com/promos/sf_ept2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test, (continued)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test Matthew Leeds (Oct 06)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test R. DuFresne (Oct 06)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test Gregory Spath (Oct 06)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test Seth Fogie (Oct 06)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test Michael Sierchio (Oct 07)
- RE: Wireless Pent-Test Christopher Harrington (Oct 06)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test Raistlin (Oct 07)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test Cedric Blancher (Oct 08)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test Raistlin (Oct 08)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test Matthew Leeds (Oct 06)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test n0g0013 (Oct 07)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test goat (Oct 06)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test Gregory Spath (Oct 06)