Cisco HTTP IOS Vuln Clarification

[Josha Bronson <dmuz () slartibartfast angrypacket com>]

Hi folks,

Little question regarding the Cisco IOS HTTP Admin vuln that was
released a while ago. 

As most of you probably know the vuln I won't discuss it. See
<http://securityfocus.com/bid/2936>.

Can anyone clarify whether or not a server may be vulnerable only to a
subset of the numbers in the range? Meaning that "/level/17/exec/" may
work to access the system but "/level/99/exec/" may not. Or is it the
nature of this vulnerability that if a system is accessible via one URL
than it would be accessible via all?

On the systems I've tested they all work.

Thanks for your help, there is just way to many revisions of IOS
vulnerable to test them all, ;)
-- 
josha.bronson(aka->dmuz) >> dmuz () angrypacket com
networks/systems/security && CCNA, RHCE 
josha.net || dmuz.angrypacket.com


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus Security Intelligence Alert (SIA)
Service. For more information on SecurityFocus' SIA service which
automatically alerts you to the latest security vulnerabilities please see:
https://alerts.securityfocus.com/