Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: Stunnel Problems
From: Joerg Over <over () dexia de>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 11:56:00 +0100
Hi! At 00:13 07.12.01 -0000 you wrote: ---8<----------------snip ->I am attempting to access a Web Server sat behind Netscape (NetCache?) 3.5 ->proxy. Here is what I am doing. -> ->stunnel -c -d 80 -r <remotehost>:443 ->and point a browser on local host to 80. ---8<----------------snip I might be entirely wrong, but maybe depending on _how_ you point your browser, it might not try to encrypt in the first place. I'd think, that pointing like: http://localhost/ might not even try encryption, while https://localhost:80/ might trick the browser into it. Just a shot in the blue, and sorry if I didn't understand the site specific part (that looked like it might have been an entirely different access method, using a browser directly resp. using s_client without stunnel; if not, I'm wrong, of course) jo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus Security Intelligence Alert (SIA) Service. For more information on SecurityFocus' SIA service which automatically alerts you to the latest security vulnerabilities please see: https://alerts.securityfocus.com/
Current thread:
- Writing to Windows Security Log Tina Bird (Dec 05)
- Stunnel Problems Stuart (Dec 06)
- Re: Stunnel Problems Joerg Over (Dec 10)
- RE: Stunnel Problems Bugtraq (Dec 10)
- Raptor Firewall Stuart (Dec 06)
- Re: Raptor Firewall H D Moore (Dec 10)
- Re: Raptor Firewall Alex Butcher (pentest) (Dec 10)
- Re: Raptor Firewall Mike Shaw (Dec 10)
- Re: Raptor Firewall Erik Parker (Dec 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Writing to Windows Security Log Tina Bird (Dec 06)
- Re: Writing to Windows Security Log Adrien de Beaupre (Dec 10)
- RE: Writing to Windows Security Log Brass, Phil (ISS Atlanta) (Dec 10)
- Stunnel Problems Stuart (Dec 06)