Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: [PEN-TEST] War Dialling
From: Steve <steve () SECURESOLUTIONS ORG>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 09:24:35 -0700
Hi Scott. I'm not sure you would want to only seek out the numbers that are relevant to just the IT department as in my experience, it is usually some VP of HR or CEO that has the rogue modem setup. Most people war dial to identify modems that are set to answer and give backdoor access to a workstation on the network. You definitely want to cover the whole organization when doing this. -Steve
-----Original Message----- From: Penetration Testers [mailto:PEN-TEST () SECURITYFOCUS COM]On Behalf Of Scott, Mick Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 5:00 AM To: PEN-TEST () SECURITYFOCUS COM Subject: [PEN-TEST] War Dialling Being a new member to this list I am not sure how much this topic has been aired. How ever I wonder if anyone has any ideas, or pointers on how they would eliminate irrelevant numbers on a war dialling exercise. If acme.com, a global company, has a very wide range of numbers how is it best to seek out the numbers that are relevant to the IT departments. Obviously there is the social engineering approach, however I am interested in any other ideas. Apologies if this has been discussed B4 Regards, Mick
Current thread:
- [PEN-TEST] War Dialling Scott, Mick (Nov 17)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] War Dialling mshines (Nov 17)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] War Dialling Lionel Ferette (Nov 17)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] War Dialling Steve (Nov 17)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] War Dialling Talisker (Nov 17)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] War Dialling Matthew Leeds (Nov 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [PEN-TEST] War Dialling Leibolt, Gregory, NBSO (Nov 17)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] War Dialling Michael Gough (Nov 17)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] War Dialling Meritt, Jim (Nov 20)