Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: [PEN-TEST] NT 4.0 and MD4 Hash
From: Olle Segerdahl <olle () ENVY2 NXS SE>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 19:31:38 +0100
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 09:12:01AM -0800, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
I'd suggest (and I'm surprised no one's brought it up before now) that you go off and look at John the Ripper before you work too hard on this. I always use john in place of l0phtcrack. It's quicker, you can use it on multiple password systems, and it finds NT passwords that l0phtcrack didn't (or at least I got bored with waiting for it).
I think you are confusing NTLM with LM hashes... As far as I know john only has support for LM hashes, the biggest differences being that LM is case insesitive and faster to crypt, therefore john might seem faster than lc. /olle
Current thread:
- [PEN-TEST] NT 4.0 and MD4 Hash Chad Gough (Dec 07)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] NT 4.0 and MD4 Hash Chris Paget (Dec 07)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] NT 4.0 and MD4 Hash Alfred Huger (Dec 07)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] NT 4.0 and MD4 Hash Chris Paget (Dec 07)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] NT 4.0 and MD4 Hash Etaoin Shrdlu (Dec 07)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] NT 4.0 and MD4 Hash Olle Segerdahl (Dec 07)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] NT 4.0 and MD4 Hash Denis Ducamp (Dec 10)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] NT 4.0 and MD4 Hash Alfred Huger (Dec 07)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] NT 4.0 and MD4 Hash Chris Paget (Dec 07)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] NT 4.0 and MD4 Hash Paul Cardon (Dec 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [PEN-TEST] NT 4.0 and MD4 Hash Chad Gough (Dec 07)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] NT 4.0 and MD4 Hash Renshaw, Rick (R.) (Dec 07)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] NT 4.0 and MD4 Hash Osborne-1, Brett (Dec 10)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] NT 4.0 and MD4 Hash crazytrain.com (Dec 10)