PaulDotCom mailing list archives
Re: Logrhythm & Splunk
From: Ali Alhebshi <alialhebshi () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:29:22 +0300
If you work for a large organization, I wouldn't recommend splunk. Though it's not bad to meet regulatory "log management" related requirements. If your main goal is security, you better consider a SIM. It's a hassle to fine-tune Splunk to meet your security requirements. Don't think of modules, most of them are in beta and don't work as they say (EVEN COMMERCIAL). On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 3:23 AM, John Lowry <johnlowry () gmail com> wrote:
Octopussy is also an open source option. Not really answering your question, sorry. http://www.8pussy.org/doku.php On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Michael Allen <sector876 () gmail com> wrote:Hi Everybody, Does anybody have any experience with both products? How did theycompare?Which did you prefer and why? Regards, Michael _______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list Pauldotcom () mail pauldotcom com http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com-- John Lowry _______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list Pauldotcom () mail pauldotcom com http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
-- Ali Al-Hebshi
_______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list Pauldotcom () mail pauldotcom com http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
Current thread:
- Logrhythm & Splunk Michael Allen (Aug 14)
- Re: Logrhythm & Splunk John Lowry (Aug 17)
- Re: Logrhythm & Splunk Ali Alhebshi (Aug 18)
- Re: Logrhythm & Splunk Champ Clark III [Softwink] (Aug 20)
- Re: Logrhythm & Splunk Chris Keladis (Aug 21)
- Re: Logrhythm & Splunk Ali Alhebshi (Aug 18)
- Re: Logrhythm & Splunk Michael Allen (Aug 21)
- Re: Logrhythm & Splunk Michael Dickey (Aug 21)
- Re: Logrhythm & Splunk John Lowry (Aug 17)