PaulDotCom mailing list archives

Generic Users


From: digitallachance at gmail.com (Francois Lachance)
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 23:58:16 -0500

Did they give a reason why a generic account is a bad thing?  Personally, my
biggest issue with those is accountability.  Who is actually using those
generic account?  Those are typically shared accounts by different admins
from my experience.  Also, how do you keep control over who knows the
password to those accounts?

Some software, like SAP, force you to use generic accounts.  In those cases,
you should not make those accounts accessible over the network.  Instead
(this works for UNIX environments, have your users logon to the server and
then su/sudo to that account.  That leaves an audit trail.




On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Vincent Lape <vlape at me.com> wrote:

Depending on the audit you can file a compensating control if the
account uses a secure means of login. (such as ssh) and restrict where
the accounts can login from and what commands the account can run.
Without giving too much info what are these generic accounts used for?



On Jun 4, 2010, at 1:59 AM, Cezar Spatariu Neagu <cezar.spatariu at gmail.com
  > wrote:

Hi all,

I would like to ask you all about some "best practices" regarding
generic users. I had an internal audit that point out that i do use
generic users.
My solution before this was to create many of them with very few
rights.
And I have some that I use in configuration files and I can not change
the password.
How shall I treat this issue?

Thank you for the your inputs.

Cezar Spatariu

_______________________________________________
Pauldotcom mailing list
Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com
http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
_______________________________________________
Pauldotcom mailing list
Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com
http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.pauldotcom.com/pipermail/pauldotcom/attachments/20100605/0d9e6741/attachment.htm 


Current thread: