![pauldotcom logo](/images/pauldotcom-logo.png)
PaulDotCom mailing list archives
Image based steganography that survives resizing?
From: jim.halfpenny at gmail.com (Jim Halfpenny)
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:56:33 +0000
If you do not require an optical scanner then I guess a barcode could look a lot less like a traditional black and white one, so making it harder to detect with the naked eye. If you divide each bar into a %age of the image width and use the largest RGB component value then you could have a multi-colour barcode with some tolerance to resizing. Shrinking is obviously going to reduce the amount of information and may be lossy but enlargement ought to be OK. Jim 2010/1/27 Adrian Crenshaw <irongeek at irongeek.com>
Bar codes could work, but I want only the computer to see the stego, not a human. If I use a barcode, won't it show to the user? Thanks, Adrian On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Rob Fuller <jd.mubix at gmail.com> wrote:Agreed about the EXIF data, but are you only talking about binary steganography? You can hide barcodes in images pretty simply that would survive resizing just fine. Also, are you talking human or computer legible stego? Peoples choice of stego is highly dependent on message size,message contents, repetition, and placement. -- Rob Fuller | Mubix Room362.com | Hak5.org | TheAcademyPro.com On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Jim Halfpenny <jim.halfpenny at gmail.com> wrote:Image metadata may survive (EXIF, copyright strings), it really dependsonhow the program manipulating the image handles the image and metadatapartsof the file. Chances are if the hidden data is in the image data then it will not survive resizing, changes to colour deptt, colour maps etc. Jim 2010/1/27 Adrian Crenshaw <irongeek at irongeek.com>Hi all, Does anyone know of any image based steganography that survives resizing of the image? I'm looking into using blind drops, but manysitesalter images that they post. Thanks, Adrian _______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com_______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com_______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com_______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.pauldotcom.com/pipermail/pauldotcom/attachments/20100127/5887f8e1/attachment.htm
Current thread:
- Image based steganography that survives resizing? Adrian Crenshaw (Jan 27)
- Image based steganography that survives resizing? Jim Halfpenny (Jan 27)
- Image based steganography that survives resizing? Rob Fuller (Jan 27)
- Image based steganography that survives resizing? Adrian Crenshaw (Jan 27)
- Image based steganography that survives resizing? Jim Halfpenny (Jan 27)
- Image based steganography that survives resizing? Michael Douglas (Jan 27)
- Image based steganography that survives resizing? subzer0girl (Feb 23)
- Image based steganography that survives resizing? Adrian Crenshaw (Feb 23)
- Image based steganography that survives resizing? Rob Fuller (Jan 27)
- Image based steganography that survives resizing? Jim Halfpenny (Jan 27)