PaulDotCom mailing list archives

Marcus Ranum downplays importance of Pen Test Tools like Metasploit - opinions?


From: pjmcgarvey at gmail.com (PJ McGarvey)
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:46:14 -0400

Haven't listened yet either, but it sounds like the same spiel he was giving
on another podcast this past summer, maybe it was Silver Bullet.

Marcus seems almost too rational and logical to me sometimes, but I think he
is putting the focus on the right thing, software design and execution...
fixing things at the source.

But I can relate this scenario to AV in that just because our Enterprise AV
program says it stopped or deleted a virus, it's still a very good idea to
make sure that there is no evidence of it on a system.  Don't trust the
software to tell you what it thinks is true, be paranoid.  If it's one thing
I've learned so far in security, it's that software will never be perfect.

So the same with pentesting, you may think you've got a great piece of
software (or a security-minded user base) until a skilled person with the
right tools gets a crack at them, there's no telling.

-PJ

2008/10/29 Bugbear <gbugbear at gmail.com>

So I was listening to the Risky Business Podcast this AM (#85) on my
commute in (right after finishing part II of pauldotcom) and they had
Tenable Network Security's CSO Marcus Ranum on. Marcus stated that he felt
tools such as Core and Metasploit had no usefulness in pen test. He
emphasised that a design review and vulnerability scanning should be enough.


While I may have misunderstood his statements and I do agree design/config
reviews and vulnerability scanning needs to be the first and second step of
any regular review, pen test, etc... I completely disagree on his comments
on using such aforementioned tools in conjunction with products such as
Nessus. i.e. Nessus is not going to tell me if my blackberry user is
connecting to free wifi and is vulnerable to Karma, etc..

Thoughts, comments, opinions? Interested in what the viewpoint of the broad
background of pauldotcom listeners! Or maybe someone can clarify his
comments for me.

Tim





_______________________________________________
Pauldotcom mailing list
Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com
http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.pauldotcom.com/pipermail/pauldotcom/attachments/20081029/67a6448b/attachment.htm 


Current thread: