oss-sec mailing list archives

Linux: UaF due to concurrency issue in io_uring timeouts


From: David Bouman <dbouman03 () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 02:43:27 +0200

Hello list,

We (Jayden Rivers and David Bouman) are disclosing a bug we found in the Linux kernel's io_uring subsystem. We have written a local privilege escalation PoC that can successfully elevate to system root from an unprivileged process (in a container). We will be releasing a blog post (including exploit code) in a week or two. It should be noted that unlike many Linux vulnerabilities that have surfaced recently, triggering this one does not require an attacker to have any kind of privileges (e.g. in a user namespace). This leaves many systems vulnerable.

We are still looking for a CNA representative that can assign a CVE number for this vulnerability; please contact us!

Kernel versions 5.10+ are affected, and linux-stable patches are already pushed. The upstream patch commit is e677edbcabee849bfdd43f1602bccbecf736a646 ("io_uring: fix race between timeout flush and removal").

When the IORING_OP_TIMEOUT (T) and IORING_OP_LINK_TIMEOUT (LT) opcodes are combined in a linked submission queue entry, and another request (B) finishes, a race might occur: namely, when due to the completion of B, T is cancelled (through the completion event count), and LT is canceled by its hrtimer at the same time. Whilst T is still being cleaned up, LT is already freed by a different execution context, and since they are linked, the cleanup of T retains a dangling reference to the now-freed LT. Hence, there's a use-after-free.

Exploitation-wise, the attacker can reallocate LT to another `struct io_kiocb` and defer the UaF to e.g. a `struct file` (this is the technique we will describe in aforementioned blog post).

The race window is quite tight and the scenario is complicated, so the race can only be won very infrequently in our experience.

It is advised to upgrade your kernel to latest ASAP.

Greetings,

Jayden Rivers & David Bouman


Current thread: