oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Linux BlueBorne vulnerabilities
From: Solar Designer <solar () openwall com>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 14:31:25 +0200
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:28:11PM +0000, Ben Seri wrote:
Our thought is that since these issues affect multi vendors that are using Linux, the longer the embargo period, the better chance there is a coordinated patch goes out to as many users as possible once the embargo is lifted.
Indeed, but it's 2017, not 1997. 14 days is considered a long embargo period now. Unnecessarily long embargoes hurt more than they help. Alexander
Current thread:
- Linux BlueBorne vulnerabilities Armis Security (Sep 13)
- Re: Linux BlueBorne vulnerabilities Petr Matousek (Sep 14)
- Re: Linux BlueBorne vulnerabilities Armis Security (Sep 14)
- Re: Linux BlueBorne vulnerabilities Solar Designer (Sep 14)
- Re: Linux BlueBorne vulnerabilities Ben Seri (Sep 15)
- Re: Linux BlueBorne vulnerabilities Solar Designer (Sep 15)
- Re: Linux BlueBorne vulnerabilities Ben Seri (Sep 15)
- Re: Linux BlueBorne vulnerabilities Solar Designer (Sep 27)
- Re: Linux BlueBorne vulnerabilities Armis Security (Sep 14)
- Re: Linux BlueBorne vulnerabilities Petr Matousek (Sep 14)