oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: ATutor CVE-2017-1000002, CVE-2017-1000003, CVE-2017-1000004
From: Henri Salo <henri () nerv fi>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:59:00 +0300
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 11:37:28PM +1200, Matthew Daley wrote:
On 17 July 2017 at 00:01, Henri Salo <henri () nerv fi> wrote:Is this assigment somehow related to this oss-security post? http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/07/01/3Yes.
Thanks for your reply and clearing this up. One of the points in my email was that this is not documented in the DWF item well enough. There is description_data with value, but no referer to oss-security, which should also use those issue numbers. Should the assigner or requester post this information to oss-security aswell or is the point that DWF is followed via GitHub with custom scripts? If someone makes a pull request to the item is the information populated to MITRE and NVD databases and how often? -- Henri Salo
Current thread:
- ATutor CVE-2017-1000002, CVE-2017-1000003, CVE-2017-1000004 Henri Salo (Jul 16)
- Re: ATutor CVE-2017-1000002, CVE-2017-1000003, CVE-2017-1000004 Matthew Daley (Jul 19)
- Re: ATutor CVE-2017-1000002, CVE-2017-1000003, CVE-2017-1000004 Henri Salo (Jul 19)
- Re: Re: ATutor CVE-2017-1000002, CVE-2017-1000003, CVE-2017-1000004 Kurt Seifried (Jul 19)
- Re: ATutor CVE-2017-1000002, CVE-2017-1000003, CVE-2017-1000004 Henri Salo (Jul 19)
- Re: ATutor CVE-2017-1000002, CVE-2017-1000003, CVE-2017-1000004 Henri Salo (Jul 23)
- Re: ATutor CVE-2017-1000002, CVE-2017-1000003, CVE-2017-1000004 Matthew Daley (Jul 19)