oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: CVE Request: No demangling of untrusted binaries (2)
From: Marcel Böhme <boehme.marcel () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 21:58:13 +0800
Hi,
On 30 Jun 2016, at 9:44 PM, cve-assign () mitre org wrote: Use CVE-2016-6131. As far as we can tell, there was only one vulnerability reported here.
Yes. This was a CVE request for only one vulnerability that was reported here.
We don't understand the reference to "All vulnerabilities were found with" - this seems to imply more than one vulnerability. Also, we don't understand the parenthesized numbers such as "No demangling of untrusted binaries (2)" in the Subject line, and "Libiberty Demangler segfaults (6)" and "Fix fir PR71696 in Libiberty Demangler (6)" in the references.
Moreover, this was also meant as a small update on the progress of the other vulnerabilities in GNU Libiberty that have been reported and assigned CVEs previously (and assigning credit to the tool we used; http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q2/238). Thanks! - Marcel
Current thread:
- CVE Request: No demangling of untrusted binaries (2) Marcel Böhme (Jun 30)
- Re: CVE Request: No demangling of untrusted binaries (2) cve-assign (Jun 30)
- Re: CVE Request: No demangling of untrusted binaries (2) Marcel Böhme (Jun 30)
- Re: CVE Request: No demangling of untrusted binaries (2) cve-assign (Jun 30)