oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Prime example of a can of worms
From: Andrew Gallagher <andrewg () andrewg com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 18:43:16 +0000
On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 10:15:55 -0500 Steve Grubb wrote:
Hallway discussions mentioned that ECC is dead due to trust issues and fuzzy IP issues which slowed vendor uptake. There was a mention of RSA officially being allowed to go to 16k key sizes.
Was there any mention of the relative ease of quantum attacks against ECC compared to classically-equivalent RSA? [1] That was suggested on a couple of discussion groups as a possible motivation for the newly rekindled RSA love. [1] http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0301141 -- Andrew Gallagher Senior Systems Engineer, Ward Solutions Ltd. 2054 Castle Drive, Citywest, Dublin 24 +353 87 1200174
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Current thread:
- Re: Prime example of a can of worms Kurt Seifried (Jan 20)
- Re: Prime example of a can of worms Daniel Kahn Gillmor (Jan 20)
- Re: Prime example of a can of worms Kurt Seifried (Jan 20)
- Re: Prime example of a can of worms Daniel Kahn Gillmor (Jan 20)
- Re: Prime example of a can of worms Kurt Seifried (Jan 20)
- Re: Prime example of a can of worms Hanno Böck (Jan 20)
- Re: Prime example of a can of worms Kurt Seifried (Jan 20)
- Re: Prime example of a can of worms Daniel Kahn Gillmor (Jan 20)
- Re: Prime example of a can of worms Florent Daigniere (Jan 21)
- Re: Prime example of a can of worms Steve Grubb (Jan 21)
- Re: Prime example of a can of worms Florent Daigniere (Jan 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Prime example of a can of worms Andrew Gallagher (Jan 21)
- Re: Re: Prime example of a can of worms Steve Grubb (Jan 22)