oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: CVE for Kali Linux
From: Alexander Cherepanov <ch3root () openwall com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 00:13:06 +0300
On 2015-03-23 13:38, Marcus Meissner wrote:
There are some attacks even if you verify signatures, e.g. serving old, known-vulnerable versions. HTTPS can help here (until signatures start to be widely accompanied by expiring timestamps or something).SUSE has added an expiry tag in the YUM metadata for such cases.
It's nice to see progress in this area. Does SUSE guard against other attacks from [1] too?
[1] https://isis.poly.edu/~jcappos/papers/cappos_pmsec_tr08-02.pdf -- Alexander Cherepanov
Current thread:
- Re: CVE for Kali Linux, (continued)
- Re: CVE for Kali Linux Daniel Micay (Mar 22)
- Re: CVE for Kali Linux Alexander Cherepanov (Mar 22)
- Re: CVE for Kali Linux Alexander Cherepanov (Mar 22)
- Re: CVE for Kali Linux Russ Allbery (Mar 22)
- Re: CVE for Kali Linux Solar Designer (Mar 22)
- Re: CVE for Kali Linux Russ Allbery (Mar 22)
- Re: CVE for Kali Linux David A. Wheeler (Mar 22)
- Re: CVE for Kali Linux Alexander Cherepanov (Mar 23)
- Re: CVE for Kali Linux Alexander Cherepanov (Mar 23)
- Re: CVE for Kali Linux Marcus Meissner (Mar 23)
- Re: CVE for Kali Linux Alexander Cherepanov (Mar 23)
- Re: CVE for Kali Linux Marcus Meissner (Mar 23)
- Re: CVE for Kali Linux Marcus Meissner (Mar 24)
- Re: CVE for Kali Linux Alexander Cherepanov (Mar 24)
- Re: CVE for Kali Linux Kurt Seifried (Mar 22)
- Re: CVE for Kali Linux Solar Designer (Mar 22)