oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: CVE request: BD-J implementation in libbluray
From: Jean-Baptiste Kempf <jb () videolan org>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 10:27:40 +0100
On 23 Feb, Florian Weimer wrote :
Missing Java Security Manager sandboxing mechanism / feature in the org.videolan.BDJLoader class
The code corresponding to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959433 is gone from newer release. You should upgrade, since we don't support old releases. As for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959434 "Fixing it would not change anything. Xlet (that requests the mount, or is being executed from the mount) could as well uncompress the files by self where it wants, even download other files from internet." So, maybe you want to have a full Xlet sandboxing? Or is it something else? -- Jean-Baptiste Kempf http://www.jbkempf.com/ - +33 672 704 734 Sent from my Electronic Device
Current thread:
- CVE request: BD-J implementation in libbluray Florian Weimer (Feb 23)
- Re: CVE request: BD-J implementation in libbluray Jean-Baptiste Kempf (Feb 23)
- Re: CVE request: BD-J implementation in libbluray Florian Weimer (Feb 23)
- Re: CVE request: BD-J implementation in libbluray Jean-Baptiste Kempf (Feb 23)
- Re: Re: CVE request: BD-J implementation in libbluray Sven Schwedas (Feb 23)
- Re: Re: CVE request: BD-J implementation in libbluray Florian Weimer (Mar 01)
- Re: CVE request: BD-J implementation in libbluray Florian Weimer (Feb 23)
- Re: CVE request: BD-J implementation in libbluray Jean-Baptiste Kempf (Feb 23)