oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: CVE Request for illumos distributions
From: gremlin () gremlin ru
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 09:26:38 +0300
On 2015-01-04 15:06:51 +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote:
| Use CVE-2014-9491. Shouldn't we be using CVE-2015-XXXX by now?I'd rather see CVE-2015-XXXXX - look how close we came... Is there a CVE for that?
First CVE ID in 2015 is CVE-2015-0001; once we get to CVE-2015-9999, the next ID will be CVE-2015-10000. Consider it as "CVE-%u-%04u". -- Alexey V. Vissarionov aka Gremlin from Kremlin <gremlin ПРИ gremlin ТЧК ru> GPG: 8832FE9FA791F7968AC96E4E909DAC45EF3B1FA8 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net
Current thread:
- Re: CVE Request for illumos distributions cve-assign (Jan 03)
- Re: CVE Request for illumos distributions Christos Zoulas (Jan 03)
- Re: CVE Request for illumos distributions Joshua Rogers (Jan 03)
- Re: CVE Request for illumos distributions Dave Horsfall (Jan 03)
- Re: CVE Request for illumos distributions gremlin (Jan 03)
- Re: CVE Request for illumos distributions Alan Coopersmith (Jan 04)
- Re: CVE Request for illumos distributions Marcus Meissner (Jan 04)
- Re: CVE Request for illumos distributions Steven M. Christey (Jan 04)
- Re: CVE Request for illumos distributions Christos Zoulas (Jan 03)
- Re: CVE Request for illumos distributions Steven M. Christey (Jan 04)