oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: OpenSSL RSA 1024 bits implementation broken?
From: David White <dmwhite823 () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 12:06:55 -0400
I also perused the discussion at http://www.reddit.com/r/crypto/comments/2i9qke/openssl_bug_allows_rsa_1024_key_factorization_in/, which I found by googling this email subject. Most folks there are saying that this isn't true. On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Jeremy Stanley <fungi () yuggoth org> wrote:
On 2014-10-06 16:34:29 +0200 (+0200), Pierre Schweitzer wrote:Following the information on that ML it appears not to be true. Or at least, there's no obvious evidence it happened. And lack of appropriate communication from reporter doesn't help getting rid of doubts. Unless I missed something from the thread you pointed?That's been the impression I got so far, but I have a reply on the thread pending moderator approval linking to the blog post (which seems not to have been mentioned there yet). -- Jeremy Stanley
-- David White Founder & CEO *Develop CENTS * Computing, Equipping, Networking, Training & Supporting Organizations Worldwide http://developcents.com
Current thread:
- OpenSSL RSA 1024 bits implementation broken? Pierre Schweitzer (Oct 06)
- Re: OpenSSL RSA 1024 bits implementation broken? Jeremy Stanley (Oct 06)
- Re: OpenSSL RSA 1024 bits implementation broken? Pierre Schweitzer (Oct 06)
- Re: OpenSSL RSA 1024 bits implementation broken? Jeremy Stanley (Oct 06)
- Re: OpenSSL RSA 1024 bits implementation broken? David White (Oct 06)
- Re: OpenSSL RSA 1024 bits implementation broken? Pierre Schweitzer (Oct 06)
- Re: OpenSSL RSA 1024 bits implementation broken? Jeremy Stanley (Oct 06)
- Re: OpenSSL RSA 1024 bits implementation broken? Dave Horsfall (Oct 06)
- Re: OpenSSL RSA 1024 bits implementation broken? Pierre Schweitzer (Oct 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: OpenSSL RSA 1024 bits implementation broken? Steve Kemp (Oct 06)