oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Re: CVE request - VLC 2.0.0 to 2.0.8
From: Pedro Ribeiro <pedrib () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 17:39:45 +0100
On Oct 4, 2013 5:12 PM, "Kurt Seifried" <kseifried () redhat com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/04/2013 02:04 AM, Hanno Böck wrote:On Thu, 03 Oct 2013 22:32:12 -0600 Kurt Seifried <kseifried () redhat com> wrote:Sorry forgot to reply. I'm not sure this is CVE worthy. In general crash bugs in services are CVE worthy, but crashes in client software are usually limited to things like email clients or web browsers where there is a high potential for processing untrusted data without much user interaction (e.g. displaying some random email or web page) whre you also have the potential to lose work (so there is an impact).In the case of VLC you load a nasty file, it crashes, you don't do it again. There's not really any impact. You don't lose any work.VLC is used as a browser plugin and can also be embedded in other applications. (though I'm not aware if this can crash the whole browser with the modern sandboxing stuff browsers do)So if someone can test this and report back that'd be great and then we can deal with the CVE depending on how this plays out. - -- Kurt Seifried Red Hat Security Response Team (SRT) PGP: 0x5E267993 A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSTujlAAoJEBYNRVNeJnmT5wYP/3ijX88DMXQH2ESddStu8bjq 5X4Pu+Vizi7aRFxYYg4T6XYFCvVWbzcJwQlRP1FrGzRrpS27warwz5XebZy+qGuQ bUgMWEnC0e06sokxJeWr2YZdBCxsTGTZdv0OzhtiRNXyoyEMogmzELhGnNh2zqWy VSr2eksFvIUmK5IEoxsCesbLy4mwiNixW2nvrZwS02juPpy6beyn5uKWhhU+1Phl O/OMf0yUEbFGFKsQOjesJwm1hIBGK6ZKn3CtlKjxLG5Z7VqmoCK9V1VlGEiyEwHr j4OInC6wK7NCfW+OOsg6ZQzrl5DC7CYrtT9KYtt9gpxObTk/7YhobTvYd38Abc9p G9sk08nOAesq0WF1c490ZmifQCkTKyZBO6NlRYo/Ci3VFbku6zOlzdyhM0LDimk/ xLACmeGgsXFJjxaP/4gMzTIeaZR42AYljzLRqSDzlWMgAppkLxdiGyhllxmc/cXe MRK4s5Q1qgEdxVLgQLlltTDhcv8ZX42cg2xwraN45BIl+gl66Z1nvqhUFKKWUjNo CMU6g9Wjqf+nESyum3sF61n6X/et2far/nPXDn9IZZ2+8nLF8HYJKLQmzUFXyXJ0 qBeXq6/dHzjsbZ66+c8eiLw6yH5rx9xFI66IARFFwdDzyQQPid1/Y8aAGZDwW+BQ YmesRzWsqCo5a4y4LN6Z =lLPp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hi Kurt, Thanks for the feedback, I'll keep that in mind for the future when requesting CVE's. I agree this is a minor issue, but because there is an invalid memory I read I thought it was relevant. I tested with the browser plugin on the latest Firefox, and while it crashes the plugin, it doesn't seem to crash the browser. As I said previously, I will continue to investigate whether I can get some program control, but for now it's only a measly DoS. Regards Pedro
Current thread:
- CVE request - VLC 2.0.0 to 2.0.8 Pedro Ribeiro (Oct 01)
- Re: CVE request - VLC 2.0.0 to 2.0.8 Pedro Ribeiro (Oct 03)
- Re: Re: CVE request - VLC 2.0.0 to 2.0.8 Kurt Seifried (Oct 03)
- Re: Re: CVE request - VLC 2.0.0 to 2.0.8 Hanno Böck (Oct 04)
- Re: Re: CVE request - VLC 2.0.0 to 2.0.8 Kurt Seifried (Oct 04)
- Re: Re: CVE request - VLC 2.0.0 to 2.0.8 Pedro Ribeiro (Oct 04)
- Re: Re: CVE request - VLC 2.0.0 to 2.0.8 Kurt Seifried (Oct 04)
- Re: Re: CVE request - VLC 2.0.0 to 2.0.8 Kurt Seifried (Oct 03)
- Re: CVE request - VLC 2.0.0 to 2.0.8 Pedro Ribeiro (Oct 03)