oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: tomcat CVE confusion
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried () redhat com>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 20:11:59 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08/07/2013 12:41 PM, David Walser wrote:
OpenSuSE has issued an advisory for tomcat today: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-08/msg00014.html This is also linked from LWN here: http://lwn.net/Vulnerabilities/562439/ This CVE-2013-3544 is not mentioned on tomcat's security page: http://tomcat.apache.org/security-7.html But CVE-2012-3544 is mentioned there (note the different year). Based on this Novell/OpenSuSE bug report, I believe OpenSuSE made a typo: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831119 I can't find any info about CVE-2013-3544, but the mitre page says it's reserved. Perhaps that CVE has already been allocated for some other piece of software? If so, this might cause some confusion. I'm not sure how this should be handled, but I thought it would be appropriate to point this out.
I can't comment on that CVE specifically but on the reserved thing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Vulnerabilities_and_Exposures Description[edit source | editbeta] This is a standardized text description of the issue(s). One common entry is: ** RESERVED ** This candidate has been reserved by an organization or individual that will use it when announcing a new security problem. When the candidate has been publicized, the details for this candidate will be provided. This means that the entry number has been reserved by Mitre for an issue or a CNA has reserved the number. So in the case where a CNA requests a block of CVE numbers in advance (e.g. Red Hat currently requests CVEs in blocks of 500) the CVE number will be marked as reserved even though the CVE itself may not be assigned by the CNA for some time. - -- Kurt Seifried Red Hat Security Response Team (SRT) PGP: 0x5E267993 A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSAv5vAAoJEBYNRVNeJnmTEgQQAJJe0EFOZLiYE9pSuZ7TSCth 7w5/Q+iArKakdyaz7w7WVf+POcQuKTc6/P2JJXquM4YSy7k82j+h6o4VCsRN+bvm Elha1n4f0BYaXez+7G09aAAMZ6jKXLb30D5NxWnHQV9mABVTvn7VbW/Ehy+pevXJ FWuj2cmZNHzFLmVyI/pmZUmwS9LwtPV9UA6IO9Ka024iF2OStuj0hwHWuBDtasMd R9DPhTm2/gMOx1NqIBzi0GYdbRept5M4F17E4LN+mEJBvtQVhrr0wjU8ZwjrCbFv QCBIHbqpHQjomtq7JdYoq9nyPLSP9M6E8n5WkRODYllgLDil76KKSJDXqKXI5edb v2GhdifY86v8XgAiEU8SI0CY6mFWMhztG2WaOwyvmz0nnZ52XVbGeNAtqvdTuN0K dCD06gnxyH4oZ7nu012hOGV9I+4n4wCBALQ+ql3hKZ43m4aLNqCA68OnbkD++2bG B5I3fhfQ/HTd4dfGYWy1J4fcsTUAdpDw4nJSUjNcScAfI7URiXVINk6rHN06zQvc x9jKHMCUMLxGgxMAmp/BZm3EzPS/T3TVOVJGnlQapc0DIrr1B/RGKyEBBMsMrBSZ hSAIBunqnWf37Xo92vcXZbM3pcN1OeILdB/TSog2IMIHxG4vrrHgeEfuDnNpmxy9 utRHS4sjTS0eM1sY4Pn3 =yTEy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- tomcat CVE confusion David Walser (Aug 07)
- Re: tomcat CVE confusion David Jorm (Aug 07)
- Re: tomcat CVE confusion Kurt Seifried (Aug 07)
- Re: tomcat CVE confusion Marcus Meissner (Aug 08)
- Re: tomcat CVE confusion cve-assign (Aug 08)