oss-sec mailing list archives

Re: CVE-2013-1962 libvirt: DoS (max count of open files exhaustion) due sockets leak in the storage pool

From: Petr Matousek <pmatouse () redhat com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 08:46:19 +0200

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 08:20:00PM +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:

On Thursday 16 May 2013 16:50:13 Petr Matousek wrote:

References:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2013-1962


Please do not point to a link with the CVE. If for any weird reason the cve 
will be rejected or so,  the link will be invalid. Please point to the bug 
number instead.


Makes complete sense, even though we usually keep aliases even for
rejected CVEs in our bugzilla. 

This was more of an copy&paste overlook than anything else as I usually
send non-alias bug ids.

Thanks,
-- 
Petr Matousek / Red Hat Security Response Team

Current thread:

CVE-2013-1962 libvirt: DoS (max count of open files exhaustion) due sockets leak in the storage pool Petr Matousek (May 16)
- Re: CVE-2013-1962 libvirt: DoS (max count of open files exhaustion) due sockets leak in the storage pool Agostino Sarubbo (May 16)
  - Re: CVE-2013-1962 libvirt: DoS (max count of open files exhaustion) due sockets leak in the storage pool Petr Matousek (May 16)