oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: OS command injection vulnerability in Chicken Scheme
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried () redhat com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:59:38 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/29/2013 01:50 PM, Peter Bex wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 01:33:12PM -0600, Kurt Seifried wrote:The full announcement is here: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-announce/2013-04/msg00000.html
Please use CVE-2013-2024 for this issue.
Thank you.By the way, I'm confused as to why the CVEs I've requested so far don't show up in NVD. For example, http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2012-6122 says the CVE does not exist, but Kurt assigned it in February: http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/08/2 The other CVE numbers in that mail produce a "not found" page as well and an NVD database search for "chicken" turns up nothing related to Chicken Scheme. The page says the database was last updated April 19th 2013, so that's not the cause either.Because Mitre has a large backlog of CVE's to research and write up. Submitting researched/written entries to them will probably result in your entries being posted faster. Try to remember that CVE pushed thousands of these a year, the volume is considerable.What sort of information would they require, besides the advisory I posted in my mail? If there's something I can do better to make their lives easier, I will certainly consider it!
Format it in their standard format (search for similar entries here http://cve.mitre.org/cve/cve.html) and submit that, I'm sure steve won't mind. Also the research/verification side of the data (links/notes/etc.) if you can.
Apologies for the late replyNo problem! Cheers, Peter
- -- Kurt Seifried Red Hat Security Response Team (SRT) PGP: 0x5E267993 A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRft86AAoJEBYNRVNeJnmT5rMP/Apx5kpbh+WPwJC9GFtvjpIX Eq74Uyu/zZY9mou28N7OB/R2xzTwpgqQ6wxTKIl6RbN3uKA7ptR+Y6TyMP9vvXm6 I1OruyfFMbj0/rHrr4BNy1uS/bPs4F+CCTRVHJDtFF8yjg/8F/5+M2Z6kHyAGylZ ktfrukwBogaOfHsy97XWKGLuQJP0rjjt/cfKfySkUfbAReCH4U9Ft6LtbqXgSX5V fCSWZEjHnjpxlzmw4sjyXzpH/wYiIIYnKEXJjZhHGV/kZ/QPxldFusTWvPRDunUF OjYjz5bdbfJQu9HHf1TMf5F1Z8TBhzzAaR394SX+eFqh3714RZfktyI7D+39o2kH 7QLSZg3/iqCMTrStuioo/nXuR97tnqXSdKUxvMT8VO0qLpKwR+4ffkzcqfHwRkFP d0f44nxmg3qhymJMQ+frLs1GNX1DNJKtwLBGGCu0XBXe3TDf8JD632uzcqpitanD UZs+rNIWAEhc+eAKPuwTzlTuLdefjdf2SyuC69ycIzRPkHkU/I+gEljOF4yFWcjR HpucFW+EHSuN+nERoRAKAirMAeVnNACloWbnw7BJa4xs9SdrkKfslk64vzZ1kXWz 0ZeWnJmPJl+G0lAfPt6K9Dj5kFm+w4gNgQOoEFL/BMJ4aFYqvC9pxYSEO9+CGm9f W8yhBhirKHyuAlFeZuME =OwlV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- OS command injection vulnerability in Chicken Scheme Peter Bex (Apr 21)
- Re: OS command injection vulnerability in Chicken Scheme Kurt Seifried (Apr 29)
- Re: OS command injection vulnerability in Chicken Scheme Peter Bex (Apr 29)
- Re: OS command injection vulnerability in Chicken Scheme Kurt Seifried (Apr 29)
- RE: OS command injection vulnerability in Chicken Scheme Christey, Steven M. (Apr 29)
- Re: OS command injection vulnerability in Chicken Scheme Kurt Seifried (Apr 29)
- Re: OS command injection vulnerability in Chicken Scheme Peter Bex (Apr 29)
- Re: OS command injection vulnerability in Chicken Scheme Kurt Seifried (Apr 29)