oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: CVE id request: busybox
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt () tls msk ru>
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 19:01:26 +0400
03.03.2013 18:33, Piotr Karbowski wrote:
On 03/03/2013 11:19 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:What it has to do with Debian, besides that debian was first to actually submit this bug into its own bug tracker?Acctualy not the first, the bug was reported to busybox mailinglist on 18 Dec 2012.
That's where I noticed it and submitted a bugreport to Debian BTS from there. Note that I didn't want to request a CVE# for that, and used a somewhat low severify value for the report in the Debian BTS (which was quite some time after the initial report). If I thought it deserves a CVE, I'd request one right after seeing the discussion in question :) But I guess we're muddling waters for too much already. I merely commented on the joke about Debian, -- the issue is definitely not debian-specific, Debian does not even use mdev from busybox (but allows to use it to the users). Thanks, /mjt
Current thread:
- CVE id request: busybox Nico Golde (Mar 01)
- Re: CVE id request: busybox Kurt Seifried (Mar 02)
- Re: CVE id request: busybox gremlin (Mar 03)
- Re: CVE id request: busybox Michael Tokarev (Mar 03)
- Re: CVE id request: busybox Piotr Karbowski (Mar 03)
- Re: CVE id request: busybox Michael Tokarev (Mar 03)
- Re: CVE id request: busybox Kurt Seifried (Mar 03)
- Re: CVE id request: busybox Michael Gilbert (Mar 03)
- Re: CVE id request: busybox Kurt Seifried (Mar 03)
- Re: CVE id request: busybox Thomas Biege (Mar 05)
- Re: CVE id request: busybox Thomas Biege (Mar 05)
- Re: CVE id request: busybox Raphael Geissert (Mar 05)
- Re: CVE id request: busybox Kurt Seifried (Mar 05)
- Re: CVE id request: busybox Raphael Geissert (Mar 06)
- Re: CVE id request: busybox gremlin (Mar 03)
- Re: CVE id request: busybox Kurt Seifried (Mar 02)