oss-sec mailing list archives
CVE-2011-4858 confusion
From: Sebastian Krahmer <krahmer () suse de>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 11:40:40 +0100
Hi, According to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770929 the tomcat hash collision thing got a new CVE? So CVE-2011-4084 is invalidated and we need to use CVE-2011-4858. Is that correct? Sebastian -- ~ perl self.pl ~ $_='print"\$_=\47$_\47;eval"';eval ~ krahmer () suse de - SuSE Security Team --- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstraße 5 90409 Nürnberg Germany
Current thread:
- CVE-2011-4858 confusion Sebastian Krahmer (Jan 04)
- Re: CVE-2011-4858 confusion cve-assign (Jan 04)
- Re: Re: CVE-2011-4858 confusion Vincent Danen (Jan 04)
- Re: Re: CVE-2011-4858 confusion Mark Thomas (Jan 05)
- Re: Re: CVE-2011-4858 confusion Vincent Danen (Jan 04)
- Re: CVE-2011-4858 confusion cve-assign (Jan 06)
- Re: CVE-2011-4858 confusion cve-assign (Jan 04)