oss-sec mailing list archives

Typo in description of CVE-2011-2708 and CVE-2011-4331? [was: Re: [oss-security] Fwd: XSS vulnerability in Joomla 1.6.3 - CVE-2011-2710 / CVE-2011-2708 issue]


From: Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov () redhat com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 12:45:08 +0100

Hello Steve,

  thank you for the clarification due this.

But according to latest CVE-2011-2708 and CVE-2011-4331 description assignment, there seems to be a type (rounded / cycled definition of both):

======================================================
Name: CVE-2011-2708
Status: Candidate
URL: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-2708 [Open URL]
Final-Decision:
Interim-Decision:
Modified:
Proposed:
Assigned: 20110711
Category:

** REJECT **

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-2708. Reason:
This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2011-2708. Notes: All CVE users
should reference CVE-2011-2708 instead of this candidate. All
references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to
prevent accidental usage.

This one should mention 'CVE-2011-2710' in the body (based on the
reply below).

======================================================
Name: CVE-2011-4331
Status: Candidate
URL: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-4331 [Open URL]
Final-Decision:
Interim-Decision:
Modified:
Proposed:
Assigned: 20111104
Category:

** REJECT **

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-4331. Reason:
This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2011-4331. Notes: All CVE users
should reference CVE-2011-4331 instead of this candidate. All
references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to
prevent accidental usage.

This one should use "CVE-2011-4110" in the body, based on:
http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2011/q4/378

Could you correct these two yet? (not a big deal, just wanted to
point this out those two to be described correctly, even when being
duplicates).

Thank you && Regards, Jan.
--
Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Response Team

On 11/23/2011 04:30 AM, Steven M. Christey wrote:

Let's keep CVE-2011-2710 and we will reject CVE-2011-2708. Henri, I'm
sorry about the lack of response :-(

- Steve


On Mon, 21 Nov 2011, Kurt Seifried wrote:


CVE-2011-2708 and CVE-2011-2710 are both about 20110701 XSS
vulnerability:
http://developer.joomla.org/security/news/357-20110701-xss-vulnerability.html
and I have already contacted MITRE twice to get another one marked as
obsolete.


Best regards,
Henri Salo

Ok CVE-2011-2710 is public in CVE and NVD:
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-2710, and
CVE-2011-2708 is still marked as reserved so we should probably quietly
take CVE-2011-2708 out back and shoot it.

CC'ing mitre.

--

-Kurt Seifried / Red Hat Security Response Team




Current thread: