oss-sec mailing list archives

Re: Re: CVE request for Calibre


From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried () redhat com>
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 11:33:00 -0700

On 11/06/2011 08:11 PM, Kurt Seifried wrote:
On 11/04/2011 02:45 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
Just do clarify: Issues 1 through 7.1 (8 issues) were released with the
current version that has been out for quite some time now. These
require a
CVE. Issues 8 through 14 are ones introduced only during development and
So to confirm these issues will be assigned a CVE (double checking since
this has been quite the mess):
were not released, and do not need a CVE.

So where does that leave us with the CVEs? Well, there are the issues
that
were "released" with a "version" of Calibre, and then the trove of
bugs he
introduced in the middle. I'll try to recap and separate which is which:

Ok this is quite the mess but to summarize:

http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~kovid/calibre/trunk/view/9675/src/calibre/devices/linux_mount_helper.c

1. Ability to create root owned directory anywhere. The mount helper
calls
mkdir(argv[3], ...).

Input validation

2. Ability to remove any empty directory on the system.

Input validation

3. Ability to create user_controlled_dir/.created_by_calibre_mount_helper
anywhere on the filesystem.

Input validation

4. Ability to delete user_controlled_dir/.created_by_calibre_mount_helper
anywhere on the filesystem.

Input validation

5. Ability to inject arguments into 'mount' being exec'd. On lines
78, 81,
and 83, the final two arguments to mount are user controlled. On lines
1033, 106, 108, 139, and 141, the last argument to unmount/eject is user
controlled. The "exists()" check can be subverted via race condition
or by
creating an existing file in the working directory with a filename
equal to
the desired injected argument.

Input validation

6. Ability to execute any program as root. The mount helper makes use of
execlp on lines 78, 81, 83, 103, 106, 108, 139, and 141, and the first
argument does not start with a / character. Because of this, execlp will
search PATH for the executable to run. PATH is user controlled, and
thus it
is trivial to write a program that spawns a shell and give it "mount"
as a
filename, and direct PATH to its directory.

Untrusted search path

7. Ability to mount any device to anywhere. This leads to local root,
since
you can mount over /etc/ or /etc/pam.d/ or choose-your-own-adventure.

Race condition

7.1. Ability to unmount any device.

Input validation (assuming you mean all the unmount(mp)'s in the code.

===========

So for the input validation issues please use CVE-2011-4124

For the untrusted search path please use CVE-2011-4125

For the race condition please use CVE-2011-4126


-- 

-Kurt Seifried / Red Hat Security Response Team


Current thread: