Re: CVE Request: foomatic-gui

[Josh Bressers <bressers () redhat com>]

----- Original Message -----
> On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 00:17 +1000, dave bl wrote:
> > So while there aren't that many "users" of the old
> > system-config-printer - it appears that debian old-stable (lenny)
> > maybe vulnerable (where python-smbc is not available) ... is it
> > worth
> > while giving system-config-printer a 2008 CVE as well (if none
> > currently exists).
>
> Yes, I think it is worth doing that.

This request doesn't really make any sense. It deserves a 2011 ID, that's
when the flaw was discovered.

My impression is that the code is the same, which means they will share the
same ID. If the code is totally different, we will want to split. Time, you
know best, is the code in question the same, or is it different?

Thanks.

-- 
    JB