oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists
From: Greg KH <greg () kroah com>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 13:53:45 -0800
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 01:36:40PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
Several upstreams, though disappointingly not the Linux kernel, are very good about keeping their end-users in mind and providing direct distro coordination for important security updates (MIT Kerberos comes to mind first as a great example).
Note, that is just your opinion about the Linux kernel, not all distros or developers share that view. thanks, greg k-h
Current thread:
- Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Marcus Meissner (Mar 03)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Mark J Cox (Mar 03)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Kees Cook (Mar 03)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Steven M. Christey (Mar 03)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Greg KH (Mar 03)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Kees Cook (Mar 03)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Greg KH (Mar 03)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Dan Rosenberg (Mar 03)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Greg KH (Mar 03)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Dan Rosenberg (Mar 03)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Greg KH (Mar 03)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Michael Gilbert (Mar 03)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Greg KH (Mar 03)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Mike O'Connor (Mar 14)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Eugene Teo (Mar 15)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Kees Cook (Mar 03)
- Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists Mark J Cox (Mar 03)