oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: CVE request: lxr
From: "Steven M. Christey" <coley () linus mitre org>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:37:41 -0400 (EDT)
All,I agree that these are duplicates. This arose out of an oddity in the CVE content production process, the specifics of which I'm still trying to figure out. Basically we have multiple internal "production streams" where CVE-2010-1448 was processed through one stream, and CVE-2010-1738 through another. The original CVE confusion that happened in May 2010 no doubt complicated things.
Prefer CVE-2010-1448. I have REJECTED CVE-2010-1738. - Steve On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Dan Rosenberg wrote:
Yes, CVE-2010-1738 is a dupe of CVE-2010-1448. -Dan On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Nico Golde <oss-security+ml () ngolde de> wrote:Hi, * Josh Bressers <bressers () redhat com> [2010-05-14 21:48]:----- "Dan Rosenberg" <dan.j.rosenberg () gmail com> wrote:Josh, The XSS in the title string was already assigned CVE-2010-1448. Do you mean to assign issue #2, the XSS reflected in search results?Sigh, yes. So to sum it up: 1. XSS in the ident parameter, as described in CVE-2009-4497. 2. XSS that is reflected via the search results page after issuing This one is now CVE-2010-1625 3. 3. XSS that is reflected via the <title> tag on the search page, as described in Raphael's original e-mail a few days ago, which Josh assigned CVE-2010-1448CVE-2010-1738 seems to be a dupe of this? Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - nion () jabber ccc de - GPG: 0xA0A0AAAA For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
Current thread:
- Re: CVE request: lxr Nico Golde (Jul 31)
- Re: CVE request: lxr Dan Rosenberg (Jul 31)
- Re: CVE request: lxr Steven M. Christey (Aug 20)
- Re: CVE request: lxr Dan Rosenberg (Jul 31)