oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Fwd: [Full-disclosure] stratsec Security Advisory SS-2010-005: Samba Multiple DoS Vulnerabilities (3.3.x)
From: Tomas Hoger <thoger () redhat com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 10:04:32 +0200
Hi Eren! On Fri, 28 May 2010 08:33:12 +0300 Eren Türkay wrote:
A NULL pointer dereference (#7229, CVE-2010-1635) and a crash with CUPS printers (#7298, CVE-2010-1642)
You have a wrong bug / fix for CVE-2010-1642. What you seem to be trying to pick up is the following fix mentioned in 3.4.8 release notes: o Fix smbd crash with CUPS printers and no [printers] share defined (bug #7297). Note that your bug id is off-by-one ;). However, that's not the stratsec issue, you should be looking at this: o Fix an uninitialized variable read in smbd (bug #7254). https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7254 http://git.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=commitdiff;h=9280051bfba33745 This issue should rather be described as OOB read as mentioned in Josh's CVE assignment. This problem may affect fairly old samba version, I've seen the same code / issue in some oldish 3.0.x versions. The crash is not too reliable though, I've only seen crash on some (recent) versions using stratsec reproducer (you've noticed already their advisory incorrectly labels reproducers and has them mixed-up, right?).
It seems that 3.3.x is also vulnerable as the same code seems to exist in this release as well. However, I couldn't see any reference for 3.3.x being vulnerable. I would really appreciate a statement from Samba team as to the status of 3.3.x
CVE-2010-1642 mentioned above. NULL deref CVE-2010-1635 should only affect 3.5.x, as it occurs in this code, which does not exist in 3.4.x: http://git.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=commitdiff;h=c116652a3050a854 On 3.3.x, reproducer causes smbd to follow error code path where smb_panic is called. -- Tomas Hoger / Red Hat Security Response Team
Current thread:
- Fwd: [Full-disclosure] stratsec Security Advisory SS-2010-005: Samba Multiple DoS Vulnerabilities Thomas Biege (May 20)
- Re: Fwd: [Full-disclosure] stratsec Security Advisory SS-2010-005: Samba Multiple DoS Vulnerabilities Thomas Biege (May 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Fwd: [Full-disclosure] stratsec Security Advisory SS-2010-005: Samba Multiple DoS Vulnerabilities Josh Bressers (May 25)
- Re: Fwd: [Full-disclosure] stratsec Security Advisory SS-2010-005: Samba Multiple DoS Vulnerabilities Thomas Biege (May 26)
- Re: Fwd: [Full-disclosure] stratsec Security Advisory SS-2010-005: Samba Multiple DoS Vulnerabilities (3.3.x) Eren Türkay (May 27)
- Re: Fwd: [Full-disclosure] stratsec Security Advisory SS-2010-005: Samba Multiple DoS Vulnerabilities (3.3.x) Tomas Hoger (May 28)
- Re: Fwd: [Full-disclosure] stratsec Security Advisory SS-2010-005: Samba Multiple DoS Vulnerabilities (3.3.x) Eren Türkay (May 28)
- Re: Fwd: [Full-disclosure] stratsec Security Advisory SS-2010-005: Samba Multiple DoS Vulnerabilities (3.3.x) Tomas Hoger (May 31)