oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: CVE id request: silc-toolkit
From: Tomas Hoger <thoger () redhat com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:19:10 +0200
Hi Steven! On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:20:15 -0400 (EDT) "Steven M. Christey" <coley () linus mitre org> wrote:
Sorry for forgetting to tell everyone about this. One of our CVE analysts did some deeper investigation and noticed that there was a clear break in affected versions, so we decided that a split was reasonable. This distinction wasn't immediately obvious to me when processing the initial ID request.
No worries, I just wanted to save others some time, that can be spent investigating something else. -- Tomas Hoger / Red Hat Security Response Team
Current thread:
- CVE id request: silc-toolkit Nico Golde (Aug 31)
- Message not available
- Re: CVE id request: silc-toolkit Tomas Hoger (Sep 11)
- Re: CVE id request: silc-toolkit Steven M. Christey (Sep 11)
- Re: CVE id request: silc-toolkit Tomas Hoger (Sep 11)
- Re: CVE id request: silc-toolkit Tomas Hoger (Sep 11)
- Message not available