oss-sec mailing list archives

Re: GnuTLS CVE-2009-2730 Patches


From: Jamie Strandboge <jamie () canonical com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:33:53 -0500

On Sat, 15 Aug 2009, Simon Josefsson wrote:

Jamie Strandboge <jamie-Z7WLFzj8eWMS+FvcfC7Uqw () public gmane org> writes:

On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, Simon Josefsson wrote:

Attached are preliminary patches for 2.4.1, 2.0.4 and 1.2.9 backported
from the advisory[1].

Thank you!

I have applied the 2.4.x patch on the gnutls_2_4_x branch, so it will be
built and tested by the daily autobuilder from now on.  I've tested that
the nul-in-x509-names self-test works as expected with the 2.4 library.
So in theory, it should be easy for me to make a v2.4.4 release from
that branch.  I wonder if this would helps anyone, though?  I'd imagine
that most people concerned with older releases are distributions that
have to support older GnuTLS releases.  And you aren't likely to use a
new upstream release anyway, since you just apply the patches to your
version.

I'm also concerned that there have been plenty of _other_ serious
problems in these old GnuTLS releases (check the security vulnerability
page), and I haven't back-ported the fixes to those problems to these
old branches.  So if I make a release on that branch, I'd have to check
what other serious problems would needs to be fixed for that branch to
be secure -- which sounds like real work (for little gain).

For these two reasons, I'd prefer to help you establish trust in the
patches you developed rather than make releases on old branches.


I'd agree with this. Vendors have likely backported all those other
fixes. However, having a place for people to get patches for older
releases would likely be beneficial going forward (like you are doing
with this one). This is especially true when considering your
aforementioned lack of resources.

I also added a link to your post on
<http://www.gnu.org/software/gnutls/security.html> so others can find it
easily.


Thanks!

Jamie

-- 
Jamie Strandboge             | http://www.canonical.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Current thread: