oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Root name server changes -> bind
From: Jonathan Smith <smithj () freethemallocs com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 11:48:46 -0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Marcus Meissner wrote: | The security consequences of obscure DNS root server usage are obvious, IMHO. | You might want to consider security updates to the bind package with an updated | root.hint file. (Since the story is on Slashdot, it is as public as it can get; | thus I use the regular channel for this request.) Why did ICANN allow the old IP address to be taken by an untrusted party? It would seem that IPs formerly used by root DNS servers should be permanently retired to prevent just this sort of thing. smithj -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkg0fJ4ACgkQCG91qXPaRenl1QCfWEVV3nZ7s2J1AKVO23F7CQ2l uxcAoKp9TR5X4e/hcc5sz1o+bpNVoAla =ZYQf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- Root name server changes -> bind Marcus Meissner (May 21)
- Re: Root name server changes -> bind Jonathan Smith (May 21)
- Re: Root name server changes -> bind Florian Weimer (May 22)
- Re: Root name server changes -> bind Jonathan Smith (May 22)
- Re: Root name server changes -> bind Florian Weimer (May 22)
- Re: Root name server changes -> bind Florian Weimer (May 22)
- Re: Root name server changes -> bind Jonathan Smith (May 21)
- Re: Root name server changes -> bind Steven M. Christey (May 21)
- Re: Root name server changes -> bind security curmudgeon (May 21)
- Re: Root name server changes -> bind Mark J Cox (May 22)
- Re: Root name server changes -> bind security curmudgeon (May 21)
- Re: Root name server changes -> bind Thijs Kinkhorst (May 22)
- Re: Root name server changes -> bind Marcus Meissner (May 23)