oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: CVE request: silc
From: Lubomir Kundrak <lkundrak () redhat com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:40:21 +0100
On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 13:36 +0100, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
Hi, This report about a buffer overflow in SILC was posted to bugtraq recently and doesn't seem to have a CVE number yet: http://www.coresecurity.com/?action=item&id=2206
By the way core security is wrong there. This can not be exploited into arbitrary code execution, as it will crash on memcpy called with very large (underflown negative) size argument. -- Lubomir Kundrak (Red Hat Security Response Team)
Current thread:
- CVE request: silc Ludwig Nussel (Mar 28)
- Re: CVE request: silc Lubomir Kundrak (Mar 28)
- Re: CVE request: silc Steven M. Christey (Mar 31)