Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: erronous sorting of traceroute path
From: nnposter <nnposter () users sourceforge net>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 20:22:20 -0600
On 4/26/17 2:38 PM, C H wrote:
*Q2: Why is the output not sorted according to the timestamps as stated in collumn#2?*
The latency is calculated from how long it took the original packet to reach the hop where it expired *and* how long it took the ICMP type 11 notification to come back. Some routers tend to prioritize routing packets over internal functions (such as sending the above-mentioned ICMP response). This way it is possible for an ICMP message from hop N+1 to arrive faster than from hop N because the response from N+1 is treated like a routed packet by hop N and therefore given priority over its own ICMP message. Cheers, nnposter _______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- erronous sorting of traceroute path C H (Apr 27)
- Re: erronous sorting of traceroute path nnposter (Apr 27)
- Re: erronous sorting of traceroute path Daniel Miller (Apr 27)