Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: nping showing both unreachable and successful replies for localhost under Win 7 32
From: "Michael D. Lawler" <mdlawler () lawlers us>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 07:40:06 -0400
Yep, this is now working great. At 01:21 AM 10/25/2016, é£è大ç°å V5 wrote:
Hi Michael,I missed that:) I should have fixed this issue in latest Npcap 0.10 r12, please try it at: <https://github.com/nmap/npcap/releases>https://github.com/nmap/npcap/releasesCheers, YangOn Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Michael D. Lawler <<mailto:mdlawler () lawlers us>mdlawler () lawlers us> wrote: Yes, the new version fixes it for 127.0.0.1, but not if you ping the local IP address of your machine. either with ip address or machine nameStarting Nping 0.7.31 ( <https://nmap.org/nping>https://nmap.org/nping ) at 2016-10-25 00:29 Eastern Daylight Time SENT (0.1320s) ICMP [192.168.1.100 > 192.168.1.100 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=358 seq=1] IP [ttl=64 id=50100 iplen=28 ] RCVD (0.1880s) ICMP [192.168.1.100 > 192.168.1.100 Echo reply (type=0/code=0) id=358 seq=1] IP [ttl=128 id=16704 iplen=28 ] RCVD (0.1880s) ICMP [192.168.1.100 > 192.168.1.100 Protocol 1 unreachable (type=3/code=2) ] IP [ttl=128 id=16705 iplen=56 ] SENT (1.1880s) ICMP [192.168.1.100 > 192.168.1.100 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=358 seq=2] IP [ttl=64 id=50100 iplen=28 ] RCVD (1.1880s) ICMP [192.168.1.100 > 192.168.1.100 Echo reply (type=0/code=0) id=358 seq=2] IP [ttl=128 id=16708 iplen=28 ] RCVD (1.1880s) ICMP [192.168.1.100 > 192.168.1.100 Protocol 1 unreachable (type=3/code=2) ] IP [ttl=128 id=16709 iplen=56 ] SENT (2.1880s) ICMP [192.168.1.100 > 192.168.1.100 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=358 seq=3] IP [ttl=64 id=50100 iplen=28 ] RCVD (2.1880s) ICMP [192.168.1.100 > 192.168.1.100 Echo reply (type=0/code=0) id=358 seq=3] IP [ttl=128 id=16710 iplen=28 ] RCVD (2.1880s) ICMP [192.168.1.100 > 192.168.1.100 Protocol 1 unreachable (type=3/code=2) ] IP [ttl=128 id=16711 iplen=56 ] SENT (3.1880s) ICMP [192.168.1.100 > 192.168.1.100 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=358 seq=4] IP [ttl=64 id=50100 iplen=28 ] RCVD (3.1880s) ICMP [192.168.1.100 > 192.168.1.100 Echo reply (type=0/code=0) id=358 seq=4] IP [ttl=128 id=16716 iplen=28 ] RCVD (3.1880s) ICMP [192.168.1.100 > 192.168.1.100 Protocol 1 unreachable (type=3/code=2) ] IP [ttl=128 id=16717 iplen=56 ] SENT (4.1880s) ICMP [192.168.1.100 > 192.168.1.100 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=358 seq=5] IP [ttl=64 id=50100 iplen=28 ] RCVD (4.1880s) ICMP [192.168.1.100 > 192.168.1.100 Echo reply (type=0/code=0) id=358 seq=5] IP [ttl=128 id=16720 iplen=28 ] Max rtt: 0.000ms | Min rtt: 0.000ms | Avg rtt: 0.000ms Raw packets sent: 5 (210B) | Rcvd: 9 (364B) | Lost: 0 (0.00%) Nping done: 1 IP address pinged in 4.19 seconds At 11:07 PM 10/24/2016, é£èå°å¤§ç °å âV5 wrote:Hi Michael,I should have fixed this issue in latest Npcap 0.10 r11, please try it at:à <https://github.com/nmap/npcap/releases>https://github.com/nmap/npcap/releasesCheers, YangOn Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Michael D. Lawler <<mailto:mdlawler () lawlers us>mdlawler () lawlers us> wrote:This is with 7.31 and npcap 0.10R9Starting Nping 0.7.31 ( <https://nmap.org/nping>https://nmap.org/nping ) at 2016-10-22 09:15 Eastern Daylight Time SENT (0.1420s) ICMP [127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=47715 seq=1] IP [ttl=64 id=23497 iplen=28 ] RCVD (0.2040s) ICMP [127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1 Echo reply (type=0/code=0) id=47715 seq=1] IP [ttl=128 id=27914 iplen=28 ] RCVD (0.2040s) ICMP [127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1 Protocol 1 unreachable (type=3/code=2) ] IP [ttl=128 id=27915 iplen=56 ] SENT (1.2040s) ICMP [127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=47715 seq=2] IP [ttl=64 id=23497 iplen=28 ] RCVD (1.2040s) ICMP [127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1 Echo reply (type=0/code=0) id=47715 seq=2] IP [ttl=128 id=27917 iplen=28 ] RCVD (1.2040s) ICMP [127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1 Protocol 1 unreachable (type=3/code=2) ] IP [ttl=128 id=27918 iplen=56 ] SENT (2.2040s) ICMP [127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=47715 seq=3] IP [ttl=64 id=23497 iplen=28 ] RCVD (2.2040s) ICMP [127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1 Echo reply (type=0/code=0) id=47715 seq=3] IP [ttl=128 id=27920 iplen=28 ] RCVD (2.2040s) ICMP [127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1 Protocol 1 unreachable (type=3/code=2) ] IP [ttl=128 id=27921 iplen=56 ] SENT (3.2040s) ICMP [127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=47715 seq=4] IP [ttl=64 id=23497 iplen=28 ] RCVD (3.2040s) ICMP [127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1 Echo reply (type=0/code=0) id=47715 seq=4] IP [ttl=128 id=27923 iplen=28 ] RCVD (3.2040s) ICMP [127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1 Protocol 1 unreachable (type=3/code=2) ] IP [ttl=128 id=27924 iplen=56 ] SENT (4.2040s) ICMP [127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=47715 seq=5] IP [ttl=64 id=23497 iplen=28 ] RCVD (4.2040s) ICMP [127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1 Echo reply (type=0/code=0) id=47715 seq=5] IP [ttl=128 id=27926 iplen=28 ]Max rtt: 0.000ms | Min rtt: 0.000ms | Avg rtt: 0.000ms Raw packets sent: 5 (210B) | Rcvd: 9 (364B) | Lost: 0 (0.00%) Nping done: 1 IP address pinged in 4.20 seconds -- Michael D. Lawler email <mailto:mdlawler () lawlers us>mailto:mdlawler () lawlers us _______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list <https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev>https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at <http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/>http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/ _______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list <https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev>https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at <http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/>http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/-- Michael D. Lawler email <mailto:mdlawler () lawlers us>mailto:mdlawler () lawlers us _______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
-- Michael D. Lawler email mailto:mdlawler () lawlers us
_______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- nping showing both unreachable and successful replies for localhost under Win 7 32 Michael D. Lawler (Oct 22)
- Re: nping showing both unreachable and successful replies for localhost under Win 7 32 食肉大灰兔V5 (Oct 24)
- Re: nping showing both unreachable and successful replies for localhost under Win 7 32 食肉大灰兔V5 (Oct 24)
- Message not available
- Re: nping showing both unreachable and successful replies for localhost under Win 7 32 Michael D. Lawler (Oct 24)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: nping showing both unreachable and successful replies for localhost under Win 7 32 食肉大灰兔V5 (Oct 24)
- Message not available
- Re: nping showing both unreachable and successful replies for localhost under Win 7 32 Michael D. Lawler (Oct 25)