Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Tudor's Status Report - #15 of #17
From: Tudor-Emil COMAN <tudor_emil.coman () cti pub ro>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 17:41:49 +0000
I meant 64Mb for Memory, sorry for the typo. ________________________________ From: Tudor-Emil COMAN Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 8:38:11 PM To: Jacek Wielemborek; dev () nmap org; Daniel Miller Subject: Re: Tudor's Status Report - #15 of #17 @Daniel<mailto:bonsaiviking () gmail com> That was a mistake indeed, I was scanning the first 1000 ports. I recalculated how long it should take to scan for 65536 ports and it looks like it would take a lot of time, I'm trying to see if I can do some significant improvements before starting again. I'm probably going to end up scanning a random subset of those 115 million IP's. @d33tah I used research.nmap.org. It has: * Intel Xeon E3-1230 v1/2 (4-core) * 32GB RAM * CentOS 7 OS * 2TB SATA drive * 1Gbps ethernet Bandwidth utilization would fluctuate a lot but I've seen it go as high as 79 Mbps. CPU would be at about 100% Memory at 0.2% so about 640 Mbytes. The scan was: ./nmap 0.0.0.0/0 --min-rate 140000 --min-hostgroup 8192 -T5 -n -Pn -p 80 --max-retries 0 &> /dev/null -oG mass.log -sS --excludefile /etc/zmap/blacklist.conf ________________________________ From: Jacek Wielemborek <d33tah () gmail com> Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 7:08:26 PM To: Tudor-Emil COMAN; dev () nmap org Subject: Re: Tudor's Status Report - #15 of #17 W dniu 09.08.2016 o 08:46, Tudor-Emil COMAN pisze:
Hello folks, Scanning the entire internet on port 80 finished and took 353716.09 seconds.
Hi Tudor, Four days, nice! What was the command you used? What were the specs of the server you used and how much resources (bandwidth, transfer, memory) did it use? I'd love to hear more about this. Cheers, d33tah
_______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Tudor's Status Report - #15 of #17 Tudor-Emil COMAN (Aug 08)
- Re: Tudor's Status Report - #15 of #17 Jacek Wielemborek (Aug 09)
- Re: Tudor's Status Report - #15 of #17 Tudor-Emil COMAN (Aug 09)
- Re: Tudor's Status Report - #15 of #17 Tudor-Emil COMAN (Aug 09)
- Re: Tudor's Status Report - #15 of #17 Daniel Miller (Aug 09)
- Re: Tudor's Status Report - #15 of #17 Tudor-Emil COMAN (Aug 09)
- Re: Tudor's Status Report - #15 of #17 Jacek Wielemborek (Aug 09)