Nmap Development mailing list archives
Prabhjyot's Status Report - #4 of 17
From: Prabhjyot Singh Sodhi <prabhjyotsingh95 () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 08:02:33 +0530
Hi all, Started coding this week (yay!). Accomplishments * Implemented a basic random forest (using the opencv library) on the entire nmap ipv6 fp dataset. i) This model performed way below expectation. ii) Trained a similar model on a simpler and smaller dataset (3 groups, 36 records). The basic random forest hence created manages to get a 100% accuracy on the smaller dataset. * Discovered and helped fix a small bug in opencv Priorities: * perform experiments with different set of parameters for the random forest, to produce an accurate random forest classifier. I will try different values for the termination criteria (number of trees in the forest), maximum depth of those trees, number of samples to use for each tree et cetera. * Increase the training size to the entire ipv6 fp dataset. * Think about reducing the number of groups in the entire dataset (and if it would make more sense compared to the current setting) Cheers, Prabhjyot
_______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Prabhjyot's Status Report - #4 of 17 Prabhjyot Singh Sodhi (May 23)