Re: SourceForge nmap project analysis

[jah <jah () zadkiel plus com>]

On 28/06/15 09:35, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) - lists wrote:
> Given that SF is for the opensource community, and it's not softpedia or
> download.com or other pseudo-malware-oriented commercial sites, i think
> their approach is very positive and the community reaction should try to
> keep an ongoing discussion at
> http://sourceforge.net/p/forge/discussion/communityvoice/ .
>
> That community oriented approach is what i like most in the way they are
> handling those concerns!

There's nothing in the three threads of that Community Voice forum to indicate that sf are trying to fix the problem 
they created. A number of valid concerns are raised in those threads and there's exactly one response from sf - the 
language of that response speaks for itself.

sf's approach appears to be neither positive, nor community-oriented and I wonder if you may be wishing a little too 
hard for them to do the right thing (and admit they wilfully broke a promise, "because Capitalism") or for interest 
from the (rightly indignant) community.

jah
_______________________________________________
Sent through the dev mailing list
https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/