Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Surface pro 3 debug build
From: Daniel Miller <bonsaiviking () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:54:40 -0600
Peter, Thank you! Your help was invaluable in fixing this issue. I've committed the change in r34013, and it will be in the next beta/testing release, which should be coming soon. You can also see your credit in the CHANGELOG file. Dan On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Peter Malecka <peter.malecka () me com> wrote:
Dan, I believe that everything works just fine after applying the fix. While the error buffer contains some data, the function returns without an error. From what I saw it seems that while enumerating the devices, wpcap encounters an issue opening a device – writes stuff to errbuf, skips the device and continues enumerating other devices. After applying the fix I mentioned, everything seems to work just fine, and I am actually able to run “nmap scanme.nmap.org” and get a meaningful output. p_ifaces contains two entries: - p_ifaces 0x02c22f70 {next=0x02c21170 {next=0x00000000 <NULL> name=0x02c22c60 "\\Device\\NPF_{77524534-162F-4DAE-91EC-9093F61CFE6E}" ...} ...} pcap_if * + next 0x02c21170 {next=0x00000000 <NULL> name=0x02c22c60 "\\Device\\NPF_{77524534-162F-4DAE-91EC-9093F61CFE6E}" ...} pcap_if * + name 0x02c30178 "\\Device\\NPF_{8506B6A6-4EE6-40B4-BA32-B20C01604203}" char * + description 0x02c22fa0 "Microsoft" char * + addresses 0x02c301c8 {next=0x00000000 <NULL> addr=0x02c301f8 {sa_family=2 sa_data=0x02c301fa "" } netmask=0x02c30290 {...} ...} pcap_addr * flags 0 unsigned int errbuf contains "failed to set hardware filter to non-promiscuous mode" – as a result of wpcap trying to open that Wifi-Direct adapter and failing pcap_findalldevs returned 0 That is an undocumented behaviour, but according to their documentation, you should only check errbuf when the return value is -1. It does imply that the errbuf should be empty otherwise, but does not implicitly state that. I think applying the fix does not break anything for existing users – since I copied the code from a sample and seems to fix this issue. Also – should there be any other error there (while pcap_findalldevs returns -1 and the errbuf is expected to be filled), having the errbuf set to NULL most likely cause a similar crash. As for treating this as warning – I would not bother checking the errbuf when the function returns 0 (success), since it may or may not be used and it may or may not contain meaningful data. Peter *From:* Daniel Miller [mailto:bonsaiviking () gmail com] *Sent:* Thursday, February 12, 2015 2:42 PM *To:* Peter Malecka; Nmap-dev *Subject:* Re: Surface pro 3 debug build Peter, Thanks so much! This is really helpful information. Unfortunately, it still looks like this ends up making Nmap unusable on this platform, since we just traded a crash (worst) for a fatal error (still bad). Can you see, while you debug, whether the pcap_if_t structures (pcapdevs and p_ifaces) have any valid content in them after pcap_findalldevs returns with error status? In other words, can we treat this error as a warning ("Can't enumerate all interfaces" or something) and still make do with the interfaces that *are* supported? It's a long shot, but might be worthwhile to check. Dan On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 4:26 AM, Peter Malecka <peter.malecka () me com> wrote: Daniel, I poked around wpcap source, compiled it from soruce and debugged some more. I found a possible issue there. When those wpcap functions are called, they sometimes have the errbuf argument set to null. The documentation does not state that the argument can be null. http://www.tcpdump.org/manpages/pcap_findalldevs.3pcap.html I tried fixing this issue for the --iflist command, and succeeded. I had to fix it in these 2 places: intf-win32.c char errbuf[PCAP_ERRBUF_SIZE]; if (pcap_findalldevs(&pcapdevs, errbuf) == -1) { intf_close(intf); return (-1); } tcpip.cc char errbuf[PCAP_ERRBUF_SIZE]; if ((pcap_findalldevs(&p_ifaces, errbuf)) == -1) { fatal("pcap_findalldevs() : Cannot retrieve pcap interfaces"); return NULL; } Note the new errbuf variable and how it is used in the pcap_findalldevs function instead of a null argument. There might be more places where this causes issues. On a sidenote: it was failing on the Microsoft Wifi direct virtual adapter. See attached the callstack from winpcap debug (crash on strncpy to an empty errbuf). Hope it helps. Peter *From:* Daniel Miller [mailto:bonsaiviking () gmail com] *Sent:* Thursday, February 5, 2015 11:17 PM *To:* Peter Malecka *Subject:* Re: Surface pro 3 debug build Peter, Thank you so much! I will see what I can do from here. Dan On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Peter Malecka <peter.malecka () me com> wrote: Hi Dan, I followed your instructions and ran the debugger in vs2013 (nmap --iflist). Please find attached all the output I could generate now. In the callstack.txt, there is the line and details of the wpcap call that failed (pcap_findalldevs(&p_ifaces, NULL)), the rest is wpcap debug output. I cannot see any deeper without the wpcap pdb. Hope it helps, Peter *From:* Daniel Miller [mailto:bonsaiviking () gmail com] *Sent:* Thursday, February 5, 2015 6:02 PM *To:* Peter Malecka *Cc:* dmiller () nmap org *Subject:* Re: Surface pro 3 debug build Peter, Thanks for offering to help. I've gotten several offers, but no follow-up. We really need a backtrace of the actual call that fails. Anything you can provide beyond that would be great, too. You can get the debug package here: <snip> There are bug reporting instructions on WinPcap's web site which will probably help to create better debug output: http://www.winpcap.org/bugs.htm Thanks! Dan On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 6:38 AM, Peter Malecka <peter.malecka () me com> wrote: Hi Dan, While looking at this issue on github ( https://github.com/nmap/nmap/issues/15 ), I found that you might be looking for people to help you debug new builds. Let me know if I can help. Best, Peter
_______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Re: Surface pro 3 debug build Daniel Miller (Feb 12)
- RE: Surface pro 3 debug build Peter Malecka (Feb 12)
- Re: Surface pro 3 debug build Daniel Miller (Feb 12)
- RE: Surface pro 3 debug build Peter Malecka (Feb 12)