Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Strange Fingerprint
From: Trevor Elliott <trevor () galois com>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 15:04:10 -0700
Thanks for the reply, David. I'll continue debugging :) --trevor On Sep 8, 2014, at 15:03, David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 02:58:48PM -0700, Trevor Elliott wrote:Hi David, Are the results (SEQ etc.) different because the network stack was returning different results for the repeated tests? I noticed that if I scan my linux dev machine, I don't see any repeated tests in the fingerprint, so I was wondering if I had made an error during my implementation of HaNS :)Yes, it means there were different results in different tests. It's fairly common; for instance SEQ.SP is naturally a bit variable. Sometimes SEQ.CI=RI can be confused with SEQ.CI=RD. I'm not sure why you're not getting SEQ.II=RI in your first SEQ line. If I had to guess, I'd guess that the target might be dropping some probes. http://nmap.org/book/osdetect-methods.html#osdetect-ti David Fifield
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description:
_______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Strange Fingerprint Trevor Elliott (Sep 08)
- Re: Strange Fingerprint David Fifield (Sep 08)
- Re: Strange Fingerprint Trevor Elliott (Sep 08)
- Re: Strange Fingerprint David Fifield (Sep 08)
- Re: Strange Fingerprint Trevor Elliott (Sep 08)
- Re: Strange Fingerprint Trevor Elliott (Sep 08)
- Re: Strange Fingerprint David Fifield (Sep 08)