Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [Branch] --ignore-after
From: Jacek Wielemborek <d33tah () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 14:17:04 +0200
30.07.2014 14:12, Jay Bosamiya:
1. What should the defaults for -T4 and -T5 be?
Why would timing affect ouput at all? 30.07.2014 14:12, Jay Bosamiya:> 3. Should Zenmap show ignored hosts differently?
Currently, Zenmap does not show ignored hosts at all (in the left side list). However, we need to decide whether we should show them, and if we do, should we show them differently (with probably a different icon or with italics etc.)
I don't like completely skipping it in the list - the user should have a chance to notice that such a host is there so that she could e.g. re-scan it with -sV to get a more meaningful output.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- [Branch] --ignore-after Jay Bosamiya (Jul 30)
- Re: [Branch] --ignore-after Jacek Wielemborek (Jul 30)
- Re: [Branch] --ignore-after Jay Bosamiya (Jul 30)
- Re: [Branch] --ignore-after Fyodor (Aug 13)
- Re: [Branch] --ignore-after Fyodor (Aug 16)
- Re: [Branch] --ignore-after Jay Bosamiya (Aug 18)
- Re: [Branch] --ignore-after Daniel Miller (Sep 17)
- Re: [Branch] --ignore-after Jay Bosamiya (Sep 18)
- Re: [Branch] --ignore-after Daniel Miller (Sep 18)
- Re: [Branch] --ignore-after Fyodor (Aug 16)
- Re: [Branch] --ignore-after Jacek Wielemborek (Jul 30)