Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [Nmap, Ncat] Odd Nsock bug related to ENETUNREACH
From: Henri Doreau <henri.doreau () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 20:19:50 +0200
2014-07-28 15:42 GMT+02:00 Jacek Wielemborek <d33tah () gmail com>:
Just wanted to point out that nsock/include/nsock.h says:/* EVENT CREATION FUNCTIONS * --- * These functions request asynchronous * notification of completion of an event. The handler will never be * synchronously called back during the event creation call (that causes too * many hard to debug errors and plus we don't want people to have to deal with * callbacks until they actually call nsock_loop). */IIRC my IRC chat with Henri, this is not true anymore as ENETUNREACH errors can cause callbacks to run synchronously.
Hello, thanks, you're right, this comment isn't accurate anymore (actually it wasn't totally before anyway). Before I nuke it, do we agree that calling handlers from outside nsock_loop to report errors is acceptable? Jacek, you've become a heavy nsock user. What do you think? Regards -- Henri _______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Re: [Nmap, Ncat] Odd Nsock bug related to ENETUNREACH Jacek Wielemborek (Jul 28)
- Re: [Nmap, Ncat] Odd Nsock bug related to ENETUNREACH Henri Doreau (Jul 28)
- Re: [Nmap, Ncat] Odd Nsock bug related to ENETUNREACH Jacek Wielemborek (Jul 28)
- Re: [Nmap, Ncat] Odd Nsock bug related to ENETUNREACH Henri Doreau (Jul 28)
- Re: [Nmap, Ncat] Odd Nsock bug related to ENETUNREACH Henri Doreau (Jul 28)
- Re: [Nmap, Ncat] Odd Nsock bug related to ENETUNREACH Jacek Wielemborek (Jul 28)
- Re: [Nmap, Ncat] Odd Nsock bug related to ENETUNREACH Henri Doreau (Jul 28)