Re: [nmap-svn] r33103 - in nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration: . libpcre

[Jacek Wielemborek <d33tah () gmail com>]

26/06/2014 19:37:40 commit-mailer () nmap org:
> Author: devin
> Date: Thu Jun 26 19:37:40 2014
> New Revision: 33103
>
> Log:
> Merged changes from trunk
>
>
> Modified:
>    nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/   (props changed)
>    nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/FPEngine.cc
>    nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/TargetGroup.cc
>    nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/idle_scan.cc
>    nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/libpcre/configure
>    nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/main.cc
>    nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/nmap-os-db
>    nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/nmap.cc
>    nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/nmap_amigaos.h
>    nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/nmap_ftp.cc
>    nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/nse_openssl.cc   (contents,
> props changed) nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/osscan2.cc
>    nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/output.cc
>    nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/scan_engine.cc
>    nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/service_scan.cc
>    nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/tcpip.h
>    nmap-exp/devin/lpeg-integration/traceroute.cc

Hi Devin,

David once told me that it's not the best idea to do that. This 
way you make the patch in your branch harder to read and SVN 
would merge the trivial changes anyway. Unless something is 
actually required by your branch, backporting it is not a good 
idea.

Yours,
Jacek Wielemborek

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Sent through the dev mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/